Political Taxonomies
There are at least two definitions for "Political Taxonomy":
- A categorization of the political systems, e.g. Democracy, Dictatorship... (Which I will ignore)
- A categorization of the ways that individuals value political issues, and perhaps the valuation of an issue. e.g. Liberal, Conservative... (Note this is what I am interested in, MLL)
- Minimize the number of, independant, Categories.
- Choose Categories that are: instinctive, clear, and easy to evaluate.
- Be effective at determining the important areas of agreement and disagreement between people and policies.
The one that I thought was most interesting was the: "Political Position Quiz, World's Smallest Political Quiz: 10 questions-- Libertarian vs. Authoritarian, Left vs. Right. The Advocates"
Note: This is similar to the PoliticalCompus.org analysis (See: below)
I just, 8/8/2011, started the book: "Beyond Red and Blue" and it suggests that there are 12 different political philosophies, (Political Taxonomies) that shape American debates:n
- Theocracy
- Natural Law
- Libertarianism
- Utilitarianism
- Free-market Conserfatism
- Contratirianism
- Social Conservatism
- Feminism
- Mulitculturalism
- Environmentslism
- Communitarianism
- Cosmopolitanism
See:
Notes Toward A New Political Taxonomy (The American Scene)
- Liberal vs. Conservative -- relates to one’s basic assumptions about human capacities. -- a liberal outlook trusts individuals and questions authority; a conservative outlook distrusts individuals and defers to authority.
- A liberal is someone who is generally impressed with the capacities of an individual, and who therefore wants individuals to be free to develop those capacities.
- A conservative by temperament takes the opposite side in this dispute. Most human beings are naturally afraid of freedom, eager to hand over decisionmaking power to some authority.
- Left vs. Right -- defined by attitudes towards success. -- A left-wing perspective is animated by an affinity for the losers and their interests, while a right-wing perspective is animated by an affinity for the winners and their interests.
- A left-wing perspective is animated by failure and the consequences thereof. Whether we’re talking about Rawlsian liberals or Christian socialists or orthodox Marxist-Leninists, the ultimate object of concern is the miserable of the earth. Their perspective, their needs, are the beginning and the end of political morality.
- A right-wing perspective is opposite to this. How to design a system that adequately rewards success is the essence of the right-wing political project.
- Progressive vs. Reactionary -- revolves around attitudes toward time and history -- A progressive viewpoint looks toward the future, while a reactionary looks back to the past.
- The progressive is future-oriented. Things will – or could – be better in the future than they are now.
- The reactionary, by contrast, is past-oriented. Things will – likely – be worse in the future than they are now, just as they were better in the past.
- The Economic (Left-Right) axis measures one's opinion of how the economy should be run: "left" is defined as the view that the economy should be run by a cooperative collective agency (which can mean the state, but can also mean a network of communes), while "right" is defined as the view that the economy should be left to the devices of competing individuals and organisations.
- The Social (Authoritarian-Libertarian) axis measures one's political opinions in a social sense, regarding a view of the appropriate amount of personal freedom: "libertarianism" is defined as the belief that personal freedom should be maximised, while "authoritarianism" is defined as the belief that authority and tradition should be obeyed
No comments:
Post a Comment