6/17/2005

second

F.D.R. proposed to start working on passing the "Second Bill of Rights". It is evident that they would not be passed today, and perhaps should not be, but as a taking point, I wonder what would happen if these were passed, as negative rights, e.g. What laws, regulations... would actually be in VIOLATION to them?

The proposed rights are: "The right to..."

  1. A useful and remunerative job;
  2. Earn enough to provide adequate food and clothing and recreation;
  3. Every farmer to raise and sell his products at a return that will give him and his family a decent living;
  4. Every businessman, large and small, to trade in an atmosphere of freedom from unfair competition and domination by monopolies at home or abroad;
  5. Every family to a decent home;
  6. Adequate medical care and the opportunity to achieve and enjoy good health;
  7. Adequate protection from the economic fears of old age, sickness, accident, and unemployment;
  8. A good education.
See: Blog for America

6/12/2005

pa-term

The Palo Alto city council is considering extending the term limits of its members from 2 terms to 3. As I have been thinking about the problem of incumbency, I am opening this Blog entry to discuss the Palo Alto Term Limit proposal, and perhaps my own proposal for "gentle" limits:

My initial proposal is that there be no hard term limits but that it be harder and harder for incumbents to keep their office as their vote would be decreased by "N"*5% if they had served for "N" terms. Thus, for example, a person who had already served for 2 terms would have to get 10% more vote than his rivals to stay in office a third term.

See: Palo Alto Weekly on term limits
2003 City Council results

Comments, and previous proposals and links can be added as desired, and if I see any links that are related to this subject I may add them to this Blog entry.

Unrelated, but interesting:

6/11/2005

unmatch

The funding for PBS is proposed to be decreased from $400m to $300, and the president of PBS is suspected as a strong conservative.

If PBS continues to be funded, even 25% by the Federal government, then it will be open for funding cuts and changes in objectives, so I propose that the viewers take over the portion of the funding that the government is now supplying and the management, and thus its direction be determined by its funding viewers.

    First: I propose to give money to PBS under an UnMatching condition, e.g. for every dollar I contribute, I will require that PBS cut their government funding by half a dollar. In this way they will have an increase in their funding while still removing their dependance on the government.

    Second: I propose that PBS management be elected by their members. either by one person one vote, or by one dollar one vote (excluding coprorate advertisers).


In this way as the viewers can control the direction of PBS as their support increases relative to government funding.

See:

6/07/2005

srsa

States Rights Separation Act

    1) Hereafter all federal acts, bills, regulations shall only apply to interstate commerce and not be extended to state declared legal activities wholly within a state unless there is a separate section defining how they effect the internal state activities.

    2) These separate sections must separable in that they must be voted upon separately, be veto-able separately, as well as be able to be declared unconstitutionally separately.

    3) Specifically the laws dealing with marijuana shall not be extended to the states that have, or may, pass laws permitting such use.

    4) The congress may pass other specific sections to existing bills that limit their application to interstate commerce if they so choose.


==================================================

I am suggesting that the proceeding "States Rights Separation Act", SRSA, be passed by the US government to allow the states to reasonably independent. It is my hope that it allow the congress to do what it does now, but still provide, as a default, that federal laws, regulations, etc. do not automatically limit the states.

This act allows the federal government to specify when they need the states follow a law, but otherwise it permits the states to enact their own laws.

=======================================

I plan to submit this to my representatives, other blogs, and some lawyers to determine if this act is legal, how it should be re-written and if it is possible to have it passed by the congress.

It is hoped that there will be suggestions as to how the act might improved as well as comments that indicate approval or disapproval.

======================================
Also see:

The New Republic. on the decision

My opinion on the decision

New York Times news on the decision

Paul Compos on the decision

Nick Gillespie, of Reason magazine on the decision

Support: H.R. 2087, the "States' Rights to Medical Marijuana Act" discussed over at the Drug War Rant

Wall Street Journal on the decision

The Talent Show on the decision

D. T. Armentano on the decision, Lew Rockwell

marijuana

It is my "thought" that the Supreme court decision on the California vs.. Federal marijuana law is wrong in two areas. As I am not a law person, this thought is based on my ideas of right-ness and not law.

1) I personally think that the extension of the Congress’ Commerce Clause should not be extended to the commerce totally within a state even if it can be rationalized as somewhat effecting the flow of products between states. We see how this leads to the stretching of the national law into the area that one would logically think is the state's domain, and that our federal society would be better served if the federal government did not impose itself in the states affairs except perhaps where the state is restricting people's rights further than the constitution permits.

2) Secondarily, the use of the commerce clause to control activity within the state where the interstate activity is ILLEGAL seems even more a stretch. If one is to reject the general argument "1)" that it would be better if the federal government only controlled interstate commerce, then it seems reasonable that the federal goverment only has the right to control activity within a state where the activity leads to an increased violation of the interstate law. On the other hand, the California law, if properly enforced, will, if anything decrease the amount of illegal interstate traffic and thus assist the federal government in reducing the flow of illegal interstate drugs.

Thus, it seems to me that both on

a) general considerations, The commerce clause should not be extended to activities within the state that have only minor effects on interstate commerse, and on a

b) specific condition, that the California mariuana law may well decrease the illegal flow of mariuana, the Supreme court
"got it wrong"

5/30/2005

Gerrymandering

I am writing the following to my Governmental representatives and other opinion groups supporting an effort to reduce the Gerrymandering.
    I have just read the editorial in the New York Times discussing:
    "Ending the Gerrymander Wars"

    I think that this effort is one of the most important ones in this congress, and I hope that you look into this proposal, evaluate it, and either work in a bipartasan way to revise it or pass it.

    Article: http://www.nytimes.com/2005/05/30/opinion/30mon1.html?8br
    Comments:
    http://forums.nytimes.com/top/opinion/readersopinions/forums/editorialsoped/todayseditorials/index.html?page=recent


    Thanks...

5/27/2005

NotePad V5

(NOTE: I mispelled it as NotePad, and except in the "title"s have corrected it to NoteTab, Sorry, My Bad)

I like NoteTab, and as it has been over a year and a half since it has been upgraded, I am starting this Blog entry to allow the status of the upgrade to be posted and, if appropriate, Feature enhancements to be suggested.

Status:
My post to the mailing list asked for an update on the current status and suggested that we offer to help pay for a new version with specific features. Please feel free to add your suggestions to this Blog, or to NoteTab yahoo group. I will update this posting as I get more information or if it seems "reasonable" to start collecting a list of the Feature requests

Enhancements:
  • Customizable syntax highlighting -- ron_riche
  • Tree view outlines -- ron_riche
  • Customizable keyboard shortcuts -- ron_riche
  • Shortcuts to clips -- ron_riche
  • Blocking/columnar selecting -- ron_riche
  • Make line numbers paragraph numbers when word wrap
    is on -- ron_riche [pet]
  • Make 'scroll past end of line' buffer dependent -- ron_riche [pet]
  • $10 -- Allow the Replacement window to be "hidden" by the Main window -- mll
  • $10 -- Click on a blank area in the tabs bar to open a new text area NoName... -- mll
  • $10 -- Retain the "Regular Expression" and "All" setting in the replacement dialog between activations -- mll

Also see:



Unrelated Links:

5/26/2005

definitions

In discussing politics there are a number of words/phrases that are used differently by various people. The following is my attempt to define/discuss some of these.
  • Position classification
      1. Universial -- If 90% of the population supports it.
      2. Consensious -- If 66% of the population supports it.
      3. Majority -- If 50% supports.
      4. Extreme -- If 10% of the population supports it.
    • Bipartisan -- A position that is supported by at least 33% (or 10%) of both parties. Note: Given that there are often a few people of each party who might support any position, I would reserve this to one that is supported by a significant percent of each party.
      • Partisan -- Reverse -- A position that is supported by at least 66% of one party and opposed by 66% of the other party
    • Flag phrase -- A phrase that indicates the positon of the speaker. Often the same issue can be refered to by different phrases depending on which side of the issue one is on. Various people have indicated that the "framing" of the issue may also help to convince the un-decided the valdity of a specific side.
    • Toxic Terminology also Black Hole issue -- A word, phrase, etc. that is so emotional that it prevents any further discussion, e.g. Hitler, Partial birth abortion, etc.
    • Wedge Issue (used by Democrats), Moral Issue or Faith based issue (used by Republicans) -- An issue that is emotionally very important to a small group within the population but has little direct effect on most people's lives.
    Also See:

    5/25/2005

    memo-of-understanding

    Memorandum Of Understanding On Judicial Nominations (RedState.org)
    • but Frist hangs tough on 'nuclear' (The Hill)
    • The group of 14 (CNN)
      • Democrats
        1. Robert Byrd (West Virginia)
        2. Daniel Inouye (Hawaii)
        3. Mary Landrieu (Louisiana)
        4. Joseph Lieberman (Connecticut)
        5. Ben Nelson (Nebraska)
        6. Mark Pryor (Arkansas)
        7. Ken Salazar (Colorado)
        Republicans
        1. Lincoln Chafee (Rhode Island)
        2. Susan Collins (Maine)
        3. Mike DeWine (Ohio)
        4. Lindsey Graham (South Carolina)
        5. John McCain (Arizona)
        6. Olympia Snowe (Maine)
        7. John Warner (Virginia)
    Sequence of events?
    1. Vote on, and in general confirm:
      Janice Rogers Brown, Priscilla R. Owen, William H. Pryor, Jr., "FS", William G. Myers III, Henry Saad, Terrence W. Boyle, Richard Allen Griffin, William Haynes, Brett M. Kavanaugh.
    2. Sometime the President proposes a Judge (perhaps for the Suprime Court) who a sufficient number of the "Group" Democrats wish to filibuster. (Note: this might occur after the first 3 of the preceeding judges are confirmed.
    3. Either a sufficient number of the "Group" Republicans
    • a) decide that this is not an extraordinary circumstance, and thus vote to overturn the filibuster rule, or they
    • b) decide that the commitment to retain the filibuster rule is to be maintained and thus they vote to retain the filibuster rule.
    If "a)" then the memo is a "winner" for the Republicans as they got the first 3 approved before there was a test of the filibuster rule. if "b)" then the memo is a compromise, the Republicans get the first 3 approved in return for ensuring that the Filibuster rule is retained thry 2006

    Political Calculations -- easy-to-use, simple calculators are created and presented to do math related to current events, in addition to more traditional analysis

    5/20/2005

    spin

    THE SPIN TIMELINE: It has gone chronologically something like this:
    1. It's not true. It's not true.
    2. It may be true but it's not ...
    3. Okay, it's ..., but isn't official policy.
    4. It may be true and official policy, but we changed the policy and we uncovered the abuses ourselves.
    5. It may be true, it may have been widespread, but we've punished the culprits. (Low Level)
    6. It may be true, it may have been widespread, it may still be happening, but all these reports are old news.
    7. "6.", but it is also being done by our enemies.
    8. "6." but it was done for a higher good.
    Examples of ...:
    • Torture
    • Stating that there were WMD's
    • Calling the others "like" Hitler

    software-voip

    Implement the 911 service by VoIp software/Hardware?


    If one is "building" a VoIp system, is it possible, LEGAL?, to set it up so that the user could initally enter their current zipcode/areacode and then have the hardware/software that they are using intercept the 911 dial and re-direct it to the proper 911 system.

    It seems to me that this might not require much on the part of the supporting DSL/CABLE system, but could be reasonably easly implemented by the VoIp software/hardware.

    See:

    5/19/2005

    world-taxes

    The Tax World Gets Flat & Happy Jack Anderson, 05.23.05 -- Forbes
    • The [Tax] Misery* score is the sum of the taxes shown [on the image to the right], at the highest marginal rate in each locale. It is our best proxy for evaluating whether policy attracts or repels capital and talent
    • Tax Misery by country chart Original source Mahalanobis.
    Links
    • E-democracy "Building online public space in the heart of real democracy and community since 1994." > Groupserver "best social software platform we've seen to date for online communities that average citizens actually use" (Britsh)
    • Free Press.net > National conference for Media Reform (may 15, 2005, Program Archives...)
    • Media Minutes is a weekly radio review (~5 min) of news at the intersection of media and democracy from the FreePress.net every Friday
    • Public radio -- xml feeds
    • Posner... on estate taxation
    Judical review...

    5/18/2005

    dtnna-leafblower

    On June 13, 2005 Palo Alto will deal with leaf blowers. This Blog entry will point to the material that I have recieved on the issue as well as allowing comments on it.

    So far the information that I have is:
    On May 26, 2005 there will be a meeting discussing this situation: (flyer) , (Letter)

    Patricia Targ

    Thursday, May 26, 7:30 PM
    1010 Harriet Street, 94301
    325-2657

    5/12/2005

    5/11/2005

    Creationism

    What Matters in Kansas, The evolution of creationism. (slate)
    • Listen to this story on NPR's (4:08)

    Creationism vs. Intelligent Design, Is there a difference? (slate)
    • Listen to this story on NPR's (2:18)


    See:

    4/20/2005

    Income is Income

    originally started by: (Matthew Yglesias)

    My proposal:

    1) It seems absolutely unquestionable to me, though others will question it, that the Estate should be taxed at least as a Capital gains, e.g. 15% (though I'd prefer a fixed tax on all income, gains...) on its appreciation so that any un-taxed gains are taxed at transfer.

    2) Alternatively, I would suggest that the Estate might will be "re-valued" at $0 when transferred, and then if it was cashed in it be taxed at normal rates, As long as it is sitting in an account, let it not be taxed, but as with all other monies, when it is cashed in, let it be taxed.

    3) I would allow the taxes to be paid, say as a rate equivalent to the interest+, so that a person who inherited it would not have to pay in one lump sum.

    ====================

    4) Finally, PERSONALLY, I think that America would be benefited if we could provide some reasonable pressure to re-equalize the society so that work and effort is rewarded and so that the richer children less of a free ride than only their parents wealth gives them while their parents are alive.

    So I would like to see a real WEALTH tax of about say 5%, that would have the wealthy pay back a part of the benefit that the society provides them. It should be low enough so that it is not oppressive and high enough so that it does apply some pressure for people to work and contribute rather than live off their past.

    3/26/2005

    Links-26

    NewspaperIndex.com is an index of evaluated newspapers in every country -- only include(s) websites with free public access that have a local editorial staff of independent journalists and in most cases a print version as well.

    home prices seem to be reasonably constant from 1945 till about 5 years ago (as compared to CPI, etc)

    3/13/2005

    Links-13

    Old posters at the George Town Book store. They generally sell for about $25.00 but small jpeg versions are available on the site for your amusement.

    Mahalanobis -- The incomes of the top 3% are distributed according to Pareto's law, (20/80 law) where as the lowest 97% are distributed according to the distribution of energy in gas, e.g. Boltzmann-Gibbs. (Original article, New Scientist) -- I think that this means 2 things:
    • There is a difference between the way income is distributed amoung the rich and the poor, at somewhere around the 3% point. e.g. Adjusted Gross income of ~ $100,000
    • The poor's income is distributed randomly e.g. as though in any interchange where as the rich'd income is distributed as though in an interchange the richer one was the more benefit one got from the interchange.
    H.R. 1133: To advance and strengthen democracy globally through peaceful means ...
    • It calls for the creation of an Undersecretary of State for Global Affairs to monitor and nudge (my legislative term) democracy and also for a special assistant to the President who'll watch over this.
    • It calls for annual reports on the state of democracy in the world. It creates an internet site devoted to spreading the word. --
    • Also of interest is the definition of undemocratic
    Framing vs. Fencing: A post-Lakoff analysis -- Daily Kos Mar 10, 2005

    2/20/2005

    links-20

    ETEXT (political) Archives were founded in the Summer of 1992 in response to the lack of organized archiving of political documents, periodicals and discussions disseminated via Usenet on newsgroups such as alt.activism, misc.activism.progressive, and alt.society.anarchy. The alt.politics.radical-left group came later.

    Eyes, Opening Up the Russian Doll, part2 -- The eye has always had a special place in the study of evolution,

    Good news for creationists Ha!! -- Since the front door of the scientific establishment is clearly open to you, as demonstrated by the eventual acceptance of the Pangaea hypothesis,- you have no excuse for trying to sneak in the back door, by using political pressure to insert your views into science textbooks.

    Liberal affars, debate club (archive) brings together a pair of experts to discuss a pressing legal question. In daily exchanges, they develop arguments, test ideas, and shape opinions.

    2/13/2005

    links-13

    Digital Rights, Digital Wrongs By Jerry Pournelle -- Byte August 16, 2004
    Interpreting The Constitution -- Feb 10, 2005 -- 'When the Senate holds judicial nomination hearings, there are often fierce debates over how to interpret the Constitution. What are these battles really about?' ( Chicago Public Radio audio stream ).

    Here is another "Escape from a locked room" game. from: mahalanobis

    It’s My Party Too is a political action committee dedicated to supporting fiscally conservative, socially progressive moderate Republican candidates at all levels of government.

    Strange political ideas -- what are the most expensive government programs? -- February 10, 2005

    Tech Support -- 16 best-ever freeware. -- November 2004.

    2/07/2005

    good-gov

    There is some discussion that Iraq may not be moving toward a "Good Government". Without taking a side on this discussion, I suggest we should determine how we measure whether a country is Good or not. I sent the following to the author of:

    Iraq and Iran

    What I would like to see is the development of a set of criteria so that as
    time proceeds we can measure the Iraq government, and others, against them.
    e.g.


    1. Competition -- There is a "reasonable" degree of un-certaincy in the
      outcome of elections.

    2. Government supremacy -- The elected/appointed Government is supreme and
      no other group has veto power over it.

    3. No State Religion -- There is no specific religious test, requirement,
      etc. in the law that favors any religion over another. (Note: We may extend
      this to not favoring religion over say agnostics)

    4. Bill of Rights -- There are guaranteed rights that specify the limits of
      the Government that are extensive and can only be changed by a lengthy
      super-majority process.

    5. Rule of Law -- The property and liberty of individuals is protected
      against government actions except through the open action of the
      governmentally authorized agencies as they follow clearly stated legal
      structures.

    6. Free enterprise -- Individuals can participate in economic interactions
      without "significant" involvement by the Government.


    Others?

    The Case for Democracy: Town Square society -- Not Fear society.
      Free societies are societies in which the right of dissent is protected. In contrast, fear societies are societies in which dissent is banned. One can determine whether a society is free by applying what we call the “town-square test.” Can someone within that society walk into the town square and say what they want without fear of being punished for his or her views? If so, then that society is a free society. If not, it is a fear society.

    Budget-07

    The proposed Bush Budget for 2006 is being released. $427B debt est. As time passes, there will be a number of comments on it. I hope that there is a discussion of it. My proposal is to have a fully functional Forum and Poll area that allows the development of both a Lean budget and a Fully Funded budget. (overview) (Tables)

    Off budget items
    • Costs of War
    • Change in Alternate Minimum Tax?
    • Effect of making tax cuts permanent
    • Effect of modifying Social Security
    • Effect of tax "simplification"

    . 1) The "Lean" budget would be a small as the Bush budget, but decrease some of the expenses and increase others to fund the programs that are better funded.

    . 2) The "Fully Funded" budget would have the same debit as the Bush budget, but in addition to different funding of various programs it would also permit elimination of some of the tax give-backs to provide more money.

    Links:

    Other:


    2/06/2005

    Links-06

    State of the Union 2005: Reality Check -- Posted: 02/03/05, American Prospective

    Thinking with Type, (on-line companion to book): A Critical Guide for Designers, Writers, Editors, & Students, by Ellen Lupton


    Pay or Free?: Newspaper Archives Not Ready for Open Web...Yet
    -- By Mark Glaser, 2005-02-01, Online Journalism Review, a Web-based journal produced at the Annenberg School for Communication

    A Fair and Simple Tax System for our Future: A Progressive Approach to Tax Reform, January 31, 2005

    2/04/2005

    ss-04

    Social Security links/Questions.

    Disability? As I read it, 10% of the money people normally pay for SS actually goes into Disability insurance etc. I wonder how this is handled with respect to Personal accounts. If a person takes 66% of his personal SS taxes for his personal account, does this mean that his disability payments will be decreased accordingly?

    Annuity? We know that if a person chooses a personal account, their SS benefits will be decreased, though the exact figure is TBD. On the other hand is their personal account their own money, or do they have to purchase an annuity?, thus effectively only allowing them to have, as their own money, the "profit" of the account.

    ----------------- Other Links ---------------

    Observed Impacts of Global Climate Change in the U.S. -- Pew Center on Global Climate Change, Nov 2004

    Fear of Physics -- friendly, non-technical place for you to come and "play" with the laws of physics for a while

    Way Back Machine -- Internet archive